Login for students

Login for employees

Publication detail

Criterion validity of the self-report dysphagia assessment tool EAT-10 among neurological patients
Authors: Mandysová Petra | Fialová Jana | Ehler Edvard | Pellant Arnošt
Year: 2014
Type of publication: článek v odborném periodiku
Name of source: Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery
Publisher name: Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě
Place: Ostrava
Page from-to: 137-144
Titles:
Language Name Abstract Keywords
cze Kriteriální validita sebehodnotícího nástroje EAT-10 u pacientů s neurologickým onemocněním Cílem bylo zjistit kriteriální validitu české verze nástroje Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), a to porovnáním s ošetřovatelským nástrojem pro screening poruch polykání Nursing Dysphagia Screening Tool (NDST). Do šetření bylo zapojeno 57 pacientů s neurologickým onemocněním. Jejich polykání bylo posouzeno pomocí nástrojů EAT-10 a NDST. Vztah mezi dichotomizovanými výsledky byl vyjádřen pomocí koeficientu phi (φ). Pro všechna zkoumaná cut-off skóre nástroje EAT-10 byl vztah s NDST negativní. Nejtěsnější vztah byl pro cut-off skóre EAT-10 = 15 bodů (phi = -0.795; p <0.001). Výsledky nejsou důkazem kriteriální validity nástroje EAT-10 pomocí porovnání s NDST. Je doporučen další výzkum týkající se této problematiky. kriteriální validita; dysfagie; EAT-10; screening; polykání
eng Criterion validity of the self-report dysphagia assessment tool EAT-10 among neurological patients Aim: The aim was to study criterion validity of the Czech version of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by comparing it with the Nursing Dysphagia Screening Tool (NDST). Moreover, the aim was to compare three items of the EAT-10 that focused on swallowing liquids (EAT3) and solids (EAT4) and on cough while eating (EAT9) with one item of the NDST, the swallow test (NDST8). Design: The design was cross-sectional. Methods: The sample included 57 hospitalized patients with a neurological condition. Their swallowing function was assessed using the EAT-10 and NDST. The relationship between the dichotomized EAT-10 and NDST and the selected items of both tools was expressed using the association coefficient phi (φ). Results: For all the studied EAT-10 cut-off scores, the relationship between the EAT-10 and NDST was negative; it was the strongest for a cut-off score of 15 (phi = -0.795; p <0.001). In all but one case, the relationship between the three items of the EAT-10 and the NDST8 was negative; it was the strongest for EAT3 (cut-off score of 3; phi = -0.701; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results do not provide evidence for criterion validity of the EAT-10 using the NDST. Further research is recommended. criterion validity; dysphagia; EAT-10; screening; swallowing

Departments

Clinics

Map

en.mapy.cz

Services

Popular Links

© 2023 University of Pardubice, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice 2
Phone: +420 466 036 111, 466 036 112, 466 036 113
Webmaster, RSS
Data box ID: f5vj9hu
Accessibility Statement
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0Creative CommonsAttributionNonCommercialNoDerivatives